Abstract Preview
Abstract
Title Medication-related health literacy measurements: A systematic review and evaluation of 48 available instruments |
Type Poster Presentation Only |
Theme Global Health Literacy Summit 2021 |
Topic Health literacy and patient safety |
Authors
Main Author Okti Ratna Mafruhah1 2 |
Presenting Author Okti Ratna Mafruhah1 2 |
Co-Author Yen-Ming Huang3 4 Olayinka O Shiyanbola5 Guan-Lin Shen1 Hsiang-Wen Lin1 6 7 |
Authors' Institution
Department / Institution / Country School of Pharmacy and Graduate Institute / China Medical University / Taiwan (台灣)1 Department of Pharmacy / Universitas Islam Indonesia / Indonesia2 College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions / South Dakota State University / United States3 Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy / College of Medicine, National Taiwan University / Taiwan (台灣)4 Division of Social and Administrative Sciences / School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin / United States5 Department of Pharmacy / China Medical University Hospital / Taiwan (台灣)6 Department of Pharmacy System / Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago / United States7 |
Abstract Content (abstracts should be written in Size 11 font, Arial font style)
Objectives: While prior studies showed the associations between inadequate health literacy (HL) and poor medication-related skills, this study aimed to identify medication related health instruments, compare the dimensions of HL within these instruments and identify the types of medication information that can be gleaned from them. Methods: Three databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) and hand-searching for original studies or systematic reviews were used to find studies about medication-related HL measures published between 2000 and 2018. The standardized operation procedures following the PRISMA were implemented to systematically search the literature, assess the validity and reliability of instruments, extract the required information of HL dimension and type of information necessary for optimal and safe use of medication (type of medication information necessary) and compared accordingly. Results: Of 6,104 available records, 48 instruments were identified from 44 studies. Thirty-one studies had 33 instruments (68.8%) which were either disease-specific or medication-specific HL studies. The majority of instruments with diverse sample sizes showed a certain extent of reliability and validity. The proportions of HL dimension and types of medication information varied across different types of studies. For medication-specific studies, comprehension and evaluation were the major dimensions of HL while dosing information and treatment indication were the main types of medication information reported. Of five instruments most appropriate for medication-related HL, four of them were from disease-specific or medication-specific studies. These instruments consistently covered the dimensions of literacy and comprehension, as well as medication-related information regarding dosing, treatment indication, and side effects/precautions. Conclusion: Only disease- or medication-specific studies tended to develop medication-related HL instruments. Hence, there is no consensus yet on how to capture the specific dimensions of HL or types of medication information. Of five instruments identified as the better options to measure medication-related HL, HL dimensions (comprehension and evaluation), and medication information about dosing, treatment indication, and side effects were commonly covered in these instruments. Further studies are needed to confirm the required HL dimensions and medication information. |
Requires Audio or Video system for Presentation?: No