Abstract Preview
Abstract
Title Are diabetes patient education materials easy to understand and act on? An evaluation of Australian resources in English and Chinese languages. |
Type Oral Presentation Only |
Theme Global Health Literacy Summit 2021 |
Topic Others |
Authors
Main Author Shanshan Lin1 |
Presenting Author Shanshan Lin1 |
Co-Author Julie Ayre1 Dannielle Muscat1 |
Authors' Institution
Department / Institution / Country Chinese studies / University of Sydney / Australia1 |
Abstract Content (abstracts should be written in Size 11 font, Arial font style) Written patient education materials are an important part of diabetes self-management education. This study aimed to examine the understandability and actionability of diabetes patient education materials in English and Simplified Chinese that have been jointly published by the Australian government and peak national diabetes organisations. MethodsIn a non-experimental study design, an assessment panel comprising health professionals and consumers rated materials using the validated Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). ResultsEight materials were identified from Diabetes Australia and the National Diabetes Services Scheme. All materials had a mean score of 70% or above for understandability and actionability in both English and Chinese, except the general information materials which scored 47% on the actionability domain. The use of visual aids, everyday language, active voice and minimal complex medical terms were identified to contribute to the acceptable PEMAT scores. ConclusionsOverall, this study provides evidence that Australian national diabetes patient education materials largely adhere to recommendations for effective written communication. Implications to Public HealthThe national multilingual diabetes patient education materials are appropriate for use as a part of diabetes self-management education, including with people with varying levels of health literacy and non-English speaking migrants.
|
Requires Audio or Video system for Presentation?: No